Twentieth Century Fox released
this interestingly creepy film noir set in London and directed by
Jules Dassin. There are countless reviews of this movie’s involved
storyline. Today, in hindsight, most seem to place it higher on a
pedestal than I. Most of the characters have few redeeming qualities
so I found it an unpleasant story. There is no denying the great
cinematography by Max Greene. One would expect nothing less of a film
set in foggy London. This is Richard Widmark's film with his co-stars coming in a distant second.
If one had been following
Widmark’s career to this point, his role here would not be a
surprise. Undoubtedly the standout of the movie, his emotional range
is astounding. Whether one liked his characters or not, moviegoers
were familiar with his talent. He portrays a slice of humanity living
a day-to-day existence. He is a desperate American con artist always
planning his next moneymaker, borrowing “investment” money, or
lying about his successes. Widmark’s pipe dreams put their trust in
untrustworthy people, however, dooming his every venture.
His
co-stars turn in creditable
performances. Francis Sullivan is an overweight, slimy nightclub
owner who has Widmark on a leash to hustle money into his club. One
would expect him to expire in this film, either by self-implosion or
at the hands of an angry Widmark. His extended hysterical laughter
after Widmark tells him of his wrestling scheme is a bit much. However, I imagine it was the director’s way of humiliating Widmark's
character even more. Google...um,
no...Googie
Withers
plays Sullivan’s estranged wife with schemes of her own. An
underplayed performance by Herbert Lom is of note. As the promotional
kingpin of the wrestling world in London, he does not take
competition kindly. There are always serious consequences.
Gene Tierney may be the weakest link in the film. She barely exudes an emotion beyond sadness. She sympathetically tries to help Widmark rid himself of his habitual demons. Her character is without fault, unlike his. Opposites do not attract in this case. She could have been easily replaced without skipping a beat. Perhaps with Jane Wyman or Evelyn Keyes.
Gene Tierney may be the weakest link in the film. She barely exudes an emotion beyond sadness. She sympathetically tries to help Widmark rid himself of his habitual demons. Her character is without fault, unlike his. Opposites do not attract in this case. She could have been easily replaced without skipping a beat. Perhaps with Jane Wyman or Evelyn Keyes.
The final scene with real-life wrestler, Stanislaus Zbyszko (above), takes a back seat to no one. His bout with Mike Mazurki packs a disgusting wallop as both men are intertwined to gain final dominance with bare-chested slaps and grunting. His death from an overworked heart, head cradled in his son's arms, is worth noting. With a face showing the ravages of time in and out of the ring, he gives a fine performance while personifying the film’s dark, unattractive premise.
Note:
Hugh Marlowe is once again a supportive third wheel, this
time for Tierney and her roller-coaster relationship with Widmark. He
is preparing “pasta flambeau” when Tierney, his apartment
neighbor, knocks on his door. His scream forces her entry, finding him engulfed in smoke. Judging by
Marlowe’s total panic, one would expect him to be surrounded by a
consuming fire of eminent death. Taint easy to burn pasta in water.
Maybe it was supposed to be humorous but there is no hint of humor in
the scene. For me, it simply establishes a weakness in
his character...cooking over an oven in a turtleneck is not his thing.
Great review! As you say, it's a Widmark showcase, where he goes from one shady scheme to another, getting more and more sweaty as his self-made noose closes around his neck. I'd disagree on how his support come across; I think Tierney is on-note (not one-note) as someone who has given her love every chance to turn around and was too drained to break it off. I admit the idea that she was a bar girl didn't mesh with her persona. The whole wrestling angle was extremely well played, and I thought the underbelly of Dassin's film was a London that was still ragged from its war years, where characters of various savory degrees slithered around trying to survive in scummy water. Mazurki and Zbyszko were standouts in my view. So glad I clicked on this site and looking forward to your next review!
ReplyDeleteYou make great points. Thanks! I may be a bit harsh on Tierney. She never fell into my Top 10. Had a very short peak period. And not to be sexist, she quickly lost her "Laura" look. Akin to Errol Flynn after 1940 or so.
ReplyDelete